来源：

向老师导言：

        你是否曾在说英语时，突然脱口而出一句从未在书本上学过的表达，不仅文法正确，而且妙不可言？那一刻，就是你的语言“自我“（the “I”）正在觉醒。而这样一种英语能力的质变，往往始于我们对语言“他我“（the “Me”）的深度内化。受到我们芝加哥社会学派创始人米德（George Herbert Mead）的启发，下面我将借用他的符号互动理论，解释这一“语言觉醒”现象；并在最后给英语学习者提供可靠的路径，为这一觉醒做关键性准备。

English, like any language, is not simply learned—it is lived into. It doesn’t arrive like a kitchen appliance off Taobao, shrink-wrapped and ready to plug in with a one-size-fits-all manual. No, it’s more like joining a big Spring Festival family dinner—you’re not sure who to greet first, someone hands you a dumpling, three people talk over each other, and you just smile, nod, and pray you haven’t taken Grandpa’s seat. Language grows in exactly that kind of chaotic, confusing, yet deeply human atmosphere. It emerges through the winding, reflective, and unpredictable process of social becoming—a journey strikingly parallel to what sociologist George Herbert Mead describes in his exploration of the self.

        英语如同所有语言，从来不是简单地被习得——而是在生命的流动中渐渐生长出来。它不会像从淘宝买来的厨房电器那样，密封包装、插上电就能用，还附带一份人人适用的说明书。它更像是你第一次参加别人家的春节团圆饭——先给谁打招呼不知道，有人递你一个饺子，三个人同时说话，你只能微笑点头，祈祷自己没坐到主人家老爷子的位子上。语言，正是在这种混乱却充满人情味的场景中，悄悄扎根生长。它通过曲折、反思且不可预测的社会化过程逐渐显现——这一历程，与社会学家乔治·赫伯特·米德对“自我”生成的深刻洞察惊人地相似。

• 向老师是从小学五年级正式开始学英语。最初的印象是更小的时候，和一位德国大叔用英文打招呼

        At the heart of Mead’s theory lies the dialectic between the “I” and the “Me”—not fixed entities, but living moments in the self’s unfolding dialogue with society. The “Me” is the organized set of attitudes taken from the social world; the “I” is the spontaneous, unpredictable response. The “Me” is the echo of the world within us; the “I” is our creative whisper back.

        米德理论的核心，是“自我”与”他我”之间的辩证关系——它们不是固定不变的实体，而是个体与社会持续对话中的动态瞬间。”他我”是从社会世界吸收的内化态度集合；”自我”则是自发的、不可预测的回应。”他我”是世界在我们内心的回响；”自我”是我们向世界发出的创造性私语。

       This tension is not only how the self is formed—it is how English is acquired, or more deeply, how English acquires us.

        这种张力不仅塑造着人格——更深刻地看，它决定着英语如何被我们掌握，或者说，英语如何将我们塑造成新的存在。

一、英语的”他我”：内化世界的语言规则

        In the early stages of English learning, the student becomes a mirror, a vessel for rules, structures, expectations—a linguistic “Me.” Textbooks and teachers act as the generalized other, offering the organized attitudes of the English-speaking world. The student absorbs not just grammar but the attitudes embedded in grammar: the politeness of modal verbs, the implied hierarchy of passive voice, the unspoken cultural rhythms of turn-taking in conversation.

        初学阶段，学习者成为一面镜子，一个盛装规则、结构和期待的容器——形成语言层面的“他我“。教科书和教师扮演着“社会他者“的角色，提供英语世界的既定规范。学生吸收的不仅是语法规则，更是语法背后隐含的态度：情态动词的委婉礼仪，被动语态暗含的等级意识，对话中轮换发言的潜在文化节奏。

        Every correct tense usage, every carefully memorized idiom, is a submission to the social “Me” of English—the learner stepping into roles made available by language. But this is not yet fluency. It is social rehearsal.

        每个正确运用的时态，每个精心记忆的习语，都是向英语社会性“他我“的臣服——学习者由此踏入语言预设的角色框架。但这还不是真正的流利，只是社会化的彩排。

二、英语的”自我”：语言创造力的觉醒时刻

        Then comes a moment. Perhaps in a conversation, perhaps while writing late at night, the student suddenly says something unplanned—struggles for a phrase and invents one. It may be awkward, it may break a rule, but it is theirs. This is the “I” in action—the learner’s spontaneous linguistic self speaking back to the generalized other.

        然后那个时刻终将到来。或许在交谈中，或许在深夜写作时，学习者突然说出未经准备的语句——为寻找某个表达挣扎，却自创了一个。它可能生涩，可能违背规则，但确属独创。这正是“自我“的显现——学习者以自发的语言主体，向”社会他者”发出回应。

        Mead reminds us: the “I” responds to the world the “Me” reflects. So too, in English learning, real fluency arises when learners stop simply obeying rules and begin negotiating meaning, bending grammar in pursuit of expression. The “I” is the poetic force in language—the source of style, of nuance, of accent, of voice.

        米德提醒我们：“自我“始终回应着“他我“所反映的世界。英语学习同样如此，当学习者不再机械遵循规则，而是为表达意图重新诠释语义、调整语法时，真正的流利才开始涌现。“自我“是语言中的诗性力量——风格、微妙差异、口音、个人特色的源泉。

        Here, English is no longer a borrowed coat—it becomes flesh. The learner becomes not a technician of speech, but a participant in the living drama of language.

        至此，英语不再是借来的外衣，而化为血肉。学习者不再是语言技工，而成为语言生命戏剧的参与者。

三、角色代入：英语学习是一种社会演练

        For Mead, the child develops a self by taking the role of others—first through play (the firefighter, the teacher, the mother), and later by internalizing the perspectives of the community as a whole. English learning mirrors this process.

        米德认为，儿童通过角色扮演（消防员、教师、母亲）发展自我，继而内化整个社会的视角。英语学习正是这种过程的再现。

        At first, the student plays roles in dialogue scripts or classroom games. These early practices are not trivial—they are the crucible of symbolic imagination. The student learns not just how to speak, but how to be in English: how to apologize, how to argue, how to tell a joke.

        起初，学习者在对话模板或课堂游戏中扮演角色。这些初期训练绝非儿戏，而是符号想象力的熔炉。学生不仅学习如何说英语，更学习如何以英语存在：如何道歉、辩论、讲笑话。

• 记得最开始上的英语培训班，我最喜欢的就是设计好角色，做好上台表演的准备

        Later, the learner begins to take the role of the generalized Anglophone other—hearing an American voice in his head, imagining how a British reader might interpret a sentence, sensing the rhythm of a podcast or the tone of an editorial. The student moves from imitation to imaginative co-presence, stepping into a symbolic world where English is not foreign—it is social habitat.        随着进步，学习者开始代入”英语母语者”的社会视角：脑海中回响着美式发音，揣测英国读者会如何理解某句话，感知播客的节奏或社论的语气。学生从模仿进阶至想象性共存，踏入英语不再是外语，而成为社交家园的符号世界。

四、语言作为自我投射：在英语中重塑自我

        To speak in a second language is not merely to change code; it is to objectify the self through new categories of being. Mead understood that language is not just for communication—it is the medium through which the self knows itself. In this light, English learning becomes a mirror, not only of another culture but of one’s own interior life, reflected and refracted through new symbols.

        使用第二语言不仅是转换符号系统，更是通过新的存在范畴来观照自我。米德深刻理解：语言不仅是交流工具，更是自我认知的媒介。由此观之，英语学习成为一面双面镜：既映照异国文化，又折射学习者通过新符号体系审视的内心图景。

        The timid student who once feared speaking becomes, through years of social-linguistic dance, a subject capable of irony, critique, confession, and command in a second language. This transformation is not grammatical—it is existential.
        那个曾怯于开口的学生，经过多年社会语言的共舞，终能运用第二语言进行反讽、批判、倾诉与掌控。这种蜕变超越语法层面，直指存在本质。

五、从语言流利到道德主体性

        Finally, for Mead, the mature self is not merely fluent in roles—it becomes an ethical agent, capable of holding society in view and choosing how to respond. So too, the mature English learner no longer parrots idioms but uses language to intervene, to critique, to persuade.

        对米德而言，成熟的自我不仅能娴熟扮演社会角色，更能成为道德主体，在观照社会的基础上选择回应方式。成熟的英语学习者同样如此：他们不再鹦鹉学舌，而是用语言介入、批判、说服。

       English becomes not just a means to survive in a globalized world, but a platform for voice, for agency, for solidarity across difference. The learner speaks not only to climb the rungs of an academic ladder, but to connect, to witness, to leave a trace.

        英语不再只是全球化生存工具，更成为发声平台、能动性载体、跨越差异的团结纽带。学习者开口，不再只是为了攀登学术的阶梯，而是为了建立联结、见证世界、留下生命印记。

六、成为自由的栖居者

        To learn English is to become a self in another tongue. It is to dance between the “Me” of collective norms and the “I” of personal expression. It is to take roles, challenge roles, and invent roles. It is to join a social world, not only by entering it but by responding to it, creatively and consciously.

        学习英语，就是以另一种语言重塑自我。这是在集体规范的”他我”与个人表达的”自我”间起舞，是接受角色、挑战角色并创造角色，是通过创造性回应（而非被动适应）来加入世界。

       Mead’s insight reveals this truth: language is not a tool we master, but a field of social action in which we are forever being made and remade.

        米德的洞见揭示了一个真理：语言从来不是我们征服的工具，而是我们永远在其中被塑造与再塑造的社会实践场域。

        And so, the English learner is not a mere apprentice—but a becoming, a voice in process, a self in formation, always speaking between the “I” and the “Me,” until finally, they do not just speak English—they dwell in it.
        因此，英语学习者从来不只是“学徒”——而是持续生成的生命，是锻造中的声音，是行进中的自我，永远在”自我”与”他我”之间言说，直至最终，他们不再只是”说”英语，而是以英语”栖居”。